There some rough cheap mlb jerseys code for downloading and merging data for the yukon and Dark surround athttp://code.google.com/p/maphew/, eventually the resultant processed and merged data will be placed online. No idea cheap jerseys when I’ll get around to that though. If you get to it first, please let me know, I have a place to host it. — MattWilkie– 2008-01-24
>Someone at AAFC in Ottawa said that they use the Canvec base for all
>their maps. Is this the same as the NTDB base in the Yukon? Do you use it?
In the Yukon canvec is derived from the 50k ntdb, and thus similar. The main difference at this time lies in naming cheap nfl jerseys of the layers and their attribute structure. The geometry is nearly identical — provided you are using the free ntdb from http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/bndt/ and not the 50k ntdb from Yukon Government (including Dept of Environment). The 50k ntdb we are using, edition 2.x (might be ed3.0), M. is behind the current release, edition 3.1.
The main change from ed2 to ed3.1 is horizontal correction. Ed3.1 will align more closely to GPS and Landsat7 data. The attributes are to unchanged.
So the bottom line is: if you are working with GPS and remote sensing data, use Canvec. If you are working with Yukon Government, use our 50k ntdb. If you have to do both, flip Valley a coin and explain to the project manager what is lost by choosing one or the other.
I apologise for a complicated answer to a straightforward question, lunginflammation and for the state of ambiguity it places everyone who works with us in.
— Matt Wilkie
> the feature catalogue does not have code “LX_2030019” listed in the appendix, yet 105p15
> has this layer in both to the GML and SHP distribution archives. Is the specification in error or is the datafile isnamed?
Camp: Modify LX_2030019 to LX_2030009
Parabolic Antenna: Modify BS_2000059 to BS_2000009